Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30969204›Full record

SynthesisObstetrics and gynecology2019

Herbal Medicinal Product Use During Pregnancy and the Postnatal Period: A Systematic Review.

Yolanda Muñoz Balbontín, Derek Stewart, Ashalatha Shetty, Catherine A Fitton, James S McLay

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Orally consumed ginger and human health: an umbrella review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effect ofJournal of medicinal food · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yolanda Muñoz BalbontínInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom; School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, and College of Pharmacy, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; and NHS Grampian, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Derek Stewart
Ashalatha Shetty
Catherine A Fitton
James S McLay
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report the incidence and nature of herbal medicinal products' adverse events and herb-drug interactions used by some pregnant and postnatal women. DATA SOURCES: The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until August 2018. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Any studies reporting adverse events, herb-drug interactions or absence thereof associated with herbal medicinal products used during pregnancy or the postnatal period were included. Conference abstracts, pilot studies, and nonhuman studies were excluded. All included studies were critically appraised by two independent reviewers. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND

resultsDatabase searches retrieved 3,487 citations. After duplicate removal and review of titles, abstracts, and full-text, 115 articles were critically appraised. After excluding irrelevant and low-quality articles, 74 articles were included for data extraction and synthesis. Adverse drug reactions, congenital malformations, fetal growth retardation or herb-drug interactions were the primary study objective reported by 19 of the 74 included studies, 16 cohort studies, one cross-sectional survey, and two randomized controlled trials. A total of 47 herbal medicinal products and 1,067,071 women were included in this review. Use of almond oil was associated with preterm birth (odds ratio 2.09, 95% CI 1.07-4.08), oral raspberry leaf was associated with cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.47, 95% CI 1.45-8.28); heavy licorice use was associated with early preterm birth by 3.07-fold (95% CI 1.17-8.05). African herbal medicine mwanaphepo was associated with maternal morbidity (AOR 1.28; 95% CI 1.09-1.50), and neonatal death or morbidity. Fourteen studies reported absence of adverse events. Four studies reported herb-drug interactions, but none studied adverse events arising from them.

conclusionThe use of herbal medicinal products during pregnancy and the postnatal period should be discouraged until robust evidence of safety is available. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42017081058.

Indexed as

PhytotherapyPrenatal CareDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansPlant PreparationsPregnancyPlant Preparations

Identifiers

PMID30969204
PMCPMC6485309
OpenAlexW2939895539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.