ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019
Repeatability of regional pulmonary functional metrics of Hyperpolarized
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using quantitative MRI biomarkers.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Actuated dose delivery and physiological monitoring ofMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Establishing standardized healthy reference distributions and values for multisiteMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Combining hyperpolarizedJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025Article
- Compressed sensing reconstruction for high-SNR, rapid dissolvedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- A decay-modeled compressed sensing reconstruction approach for non-Cartesian hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Quantifying Regional Radiation-Induced Lung Injury in Patients Using HyperpolarizedInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024Article
- Initial feasibility and challenges of hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Establishing a hemoglobin adjustment forMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Lung Volume Dependence and Repeatability of HyperpolarizedRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Article
- Functional xenon-129 magnetic resonance imaging response to antifibrotic treatment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Childhood to adulthood: Accounting for age dependence in healthy-reference distributions inMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Investigating the impact of RF saturation-pulse parameters on compartment-selective gas-phase depolarization with xenon polarization transfer contrast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- HyperpolarizedRadiology · 2022Article
- PediatricJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Article
- Utilizing flip angle/TR equivalence to reduce breath hold duration in hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Modern Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Screen for Pulmonary Complications in Patients with Dyskeratosis Congenita.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Article
- HyperpolarizedInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Article
- HyperpolarizedRadiology · 2021Article
- Regional Gas Exchange Measured byJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMRI of hyperpolarized PURPOSE: To quantify global average and regional repeatability of Barrier:gas, RBC:gas, and RBC:Barrier ratios derived from dissolved-phase STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Fourteen healthy volunteers. One subject was unable to complete the study resulting in 13 subjects for analysis (eight female, five male, ages 24-69, 53.8 ± 13.9). FIELD STRENGTH: 1.5T. ASSESSMENT: Subjects were imaged using a 3D radial 1-point Dixon method to separate Barrier and RBC component signals, at two different timepoints, with ~1 month between visits. RBC:Gas, Barrier:Gas, and RBC:Barrier measures were compared across time and with pulmonary function tests (PFTs). STATISTICAL TESTS: Repeatablilty was quantified using Bland-Altman plots, coefficient of repeatability, coefficient of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Dependence of imaging measures on PFTs and lung volume was evaluated using Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients, respectively. Statistical significance was determined by F-test for intraclass correlations, and t-test for Spearman correlations and regression.
resultsMean RBC:Gas, Barrier:Gas, and RBC:Barrier had CVs of 19.2%, 20.0%, and 11.5%, respectively, and had significant ICCs, equal to 0.78, 0.79, and 0.92, respectively. Intervisit differences in RBC:Barrier were significantly correlated with intervisit differences in DL DATA
conclusionThree commonly used LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1182-1190.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.