Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30968751›Full record

ReviewPhysiology (Bethesda, Md.)2019

A Critical Evaluation of Current Concepts in Cerebral Palsy.

Joline E Brandenburg, Matthew J Fogarty, Gary C Sieck

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Genes · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Inhibitory Synaptic Influences on Developmental Motor Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Is baclofen the least worst option for spasticity management in children?Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joline E BrandenburgDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine , Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7932-9225
Matthew J FogartyDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine , Rochester, Minnesota.
Gary C SieckDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine , Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Respiratory Control in Old AgeR01AG044615 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MANTILLA, CARLOS B, SIECK, GARY C. · 2013 to 2025
$6.9M
Recovery of Respiratory Function After Spinal Cord InjuryR01HL096750 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MANTILLA, CARLOS B, SIECK, GARY C. · 2010 to 2017
$4.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096750NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spastic cerebral palsy (CP), despite the name, is not consistently identifiable by specific brain lesions. CP animal models focus on risk factors for development of CP, yet few reproduce the diagnostic symptoms. Animal models of CP must advance beyond risk factors to etiologies, including both the brain and spinal cord.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrainHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30968751
PMCPMC7938766
OpenAlexW2937047790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.