Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30968580›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2020

Development and validation of a new score for predicting functional outcome of neurocritically ill patients: The INCNS score.

Qiong Gao, Fang Yuan, Xi-Ai Yang, Ji-Wen Zhu, Lu Song, Li-Jie Bi, Ze-Yu Jiao, Xiao-Gang Kang, Fang Yang, Wen Jiang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qiong GaoDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Fang YuanDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xi-Ai YangDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ji-Wen ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lu SongDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Li-Jie BiDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ze-Yu JiaoDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xiao-Gang KangDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Fang YangDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Wen JiangDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0612-2917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo develop and validate a novel score for prediction of 3-month functional outcome in neurocritically ill patients.

methodsThe development of the novel score was based on two widely used scores for general critical illnesses (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, APACHE II; Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, SAPS II) and consideration of the characteristics of neurocritical illness. Data from consecutive patients admitted to neurological ICU (N-ICU) between January 2013 and June 2016 were used for the validation. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate 3-month functional outcomes. APACHE II scores, SAPS II scores, and our novel scores at 24 hours and 72 hours in N-ICU were obtained. We compared the prognostic performance of our score with APACHE II and SAPS II.

resultsWe developed a 44-point scoring system named the INCNS score, and it includes 19 items which were categorized into five parts: inflammation (I), nutrition (N), consciousness (C), neurological function (N), and systemic function (S). We validated the INCNS score with a cohort of 941 N-ICU patients. The 72-hours INCNS score achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.828 (95% CI: 0.802-0.854), and the 24-hours INCNS score achieved an AUC of 0.788 (95% CI: 0.759-0.817). The INCNS score exhibited significantly better discriminative and prognostic performance than APACHE II and SAPS II at both 24 hours and 72 hours in N-ICU.

conclusionWe developed an INCNS score with superior predictive power for functional outcome of neurocritically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAPACHEArea Under CurveConsciousnessCritical CareFemaleHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedNervous System DiseasesNutritional StatusPrognosisAPACHE IIINCNSneurocritical illnessprognostic scoreSAPS II

Identifiers

PMID30968580
PMCPMC6930816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.