Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30968531›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2019

Unintended consequences of evolution of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Tamara P Miller, Brian T Fisher, Kelly D Getz, Leah Sack, Hanieh Razzaghi, Alix E Seif, Rochelle Bagatell, Peter C Adamson, Richard Aplenc

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tamara P MillerAflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-5376
Brian T FisherDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kelly D GetzCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Leah SackDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hanieh RazzaghiDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alix E SeifDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-1799-2582
Rochelle BagatellDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Peter C AdamsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-9487-757X
Richard AplencCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Toxicity Monitoring on Phase III Trials with Administrative DataR01CA165277 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI APLENC, RICHARD · 2012 to 2015
$1.8M
Improving Adverse Event Reporting on Cooperative Oncology Group TrialsK07CA211956 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, TAMARA PORTER · 2017 to 2022
$916k
Early Treatment-Related Cardiotoxicity and Subsequent Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: an Assessment of Development, Progression and MitigationK01HL143153 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GETZ, KELLY DIRINGER · 2018 to 2022
$716k
Damon Runyon Cancer Research FoundationNCI NIH HHS K07 CA211956NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211959-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165277NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL143153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse events (AEs) on Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials are reported manually by clinical research assistants (CRAs). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) was developed to provide standardized definitions for identifying and grading AEs. The CTCAE has expanded significantly over its five versions, but the impact of CTCAE definitional changes has not been examined. PROCEDURE: This study compared AE number and ascertainment among the first four CTCAE versions using a case vignette. Each CTCAE version was used to create a list of AEs and grades by two separate CRAs.

resultsThe CTCAE expanded from 9 categories and 49 AEs in v1.0 to 26 categories and 790 AEs in v4.0. CRAs independently selected different approaches to AE ascertainment-comprehensive and parsimonious. The number of AEs identified in the parsimonious approach was stable with 10-14 in each CTC version. The comprehensive approach identified 9, 20, 29, and 37 AEs in CTC versions 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0, respectively. Only approximately 65% of AEs were conclusively graded in versions 2.0 to 4.0 using the comprehensive approach.

conclusionsCTCAE has increased in complexity. Although this increased complexity allows for more granular AE reporting, these data demonstrate potential unintended negative consequences of increasing CTC AE complexity, including the risk of varying approaches to AE capture. A comprehensive evaluation of CTC AE definitions and CRA reporting practices across COG institutions and AEs are needed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of AE reporting.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNeoplasmsAdolescentClinical Trials as TopicHumansMaleadverse eventsclinical trialspediatric oncology

Identifiers

PMID30968531
PMCPMC6681806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.