ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
Cervical cell recognition based on AGVF-Snake algorithm.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nucleus segmentation and classification using residual SE-UNet and feature concatenation approach incervical cytopathology cell images.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn recent years, with the increasing incidence of cervical cancer, it is a tedious and time-consuming task with unsatisfying accuracy to manually recognize the cells. Machine recognition can be a good solution, but it suffers from the difficulty of obtaining precise edges of cells, which directly influence the final recognition accuracy. To improve the recognition accuracy and shorten the time used for cell recognition, an AGVF-Snake (Adaptive Gradient Vector Flow-Snake) model for the extraction of cell edges has been proposed in this paper.
methodsFirstly, the cell is initially located by the improved Canny algorithm. Then, the adaptive initial contour model and gradient vector model are used to obtain accurate cell edges. Finally, the PSO-SVM (Particle Swarm Optimization-Support Vector Machine) classifier is selected to recognize the cervical cells.
resultsHerlev dataset is used to verify the AGVF-Snake algorithm; the accuracy of two and seven classifications are recorded. Six other classification methods are introduced for comparison. According to the experimental results, the accuracy of two and seven classifications can achieve up to 99%, which are better than other six methods.
conclusionThe experiment results show that the proposed algorithm has obvious recognition advantages, and thus provides an effective methodological framework for the diagnosis of cervical cancer diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30968354What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.