ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
Prediction of laparoscopic procedure duration using unlabeled, multimodal sensor data.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence augmented tutoring vs expert instruction on learning simulated general surgical skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of annotation for surgical process model analysis in minimally invasive surgery based on video.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Deep learning visual analysis in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Adding Artificial Intelligence to the Surgeon's Domain.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery: Perspectives and challenges.Surgery in practice and science · 2025Review
- Use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive surgical procedures: scoping review.BJS open · 2025Article
- The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery.Cureus · 2024Review
- Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy skill evaluation from video: a new artificial intelligence-based instrument identification system.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Improving preoperative prediction of surgery duration.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Surgery utilizing artificial intelligence technology: why we should not rule it out.Surgery today · 2023Review
- Evolution of a surgical system using deep learning in minimally invasive surgery (Review).Biomedical reports · 2023Review
- Evolution of the digital operating room: the place of video technology in surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Review
- Laparoscopic Video Analysis Using Temporal, Attention, and Multi-Feature Fusion Based-Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Analysing multi-perspective patient-related data during laparoscopic gynaecology procedures.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Global-local multi-stage temporal convolutional network for cataract surgery phase recognition.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Article
- Healing Hands: The Tactile Internet in Future Tele-Healthcare.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.Medical image analysis · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence assisted display in thoracic surgery: development and possibilities.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- A Review on the Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Operating Room.Surgical innovation · 2021Review
- Patch-based classification of gallbladder wall vascularity from laparoscopic images using deep learning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe course of surgical procedures is often unpredictable, making it difficult to estimate the duration of procedures beforehand. This uncertainty makes scheduling surgical procedures a difficult task. A context-aware method that analyses the workflow of an intervention online and automatically predicts the remaining duration would alleviate these problems. As basis for such an estimate, information regarding the current state of the intervention is a requirement.
methodsToday, the operating room contains a diverse range of sensors. During laparoscopic interventions, the endoscopic video stream is an ideal source of such information. Extracting quantitative information from the video is challenging though, due to its high dimensionality. Other surgical devices (e.g., insufflator, lights, etc.) provide data streams which are, in contrast to the video stream, more compact and easier to quantify. Though whether such streams offer sufficient information for estimating the duration of surgery is uncertain. In this paper, we propose and compare methods, based on convolutional neural networks, for continuously predicting the duration of laparoscopic interventions based on unlabeled data, such as from endoscopic image and surgical device streams.
resultsThe methods are evaluated on 80 recorded laparoscopic interventions of various types, for which surgical device data and the endoscopic video streams are available. Here the combined method performs best with an overall average error of 37% and an average halftime error of approximately 28%.
conclusionIn this paper, we present, to our knowledge, the first approach for online procedure duration prediction using unlabeled endoscopic video data and surgical device data in a laparoscopic setting. Furthermore, we show that a method incorporating both vision and device data performs better than methods based only on vision, while methods only based on tool usage and surgical device data perform poorly, showing the importance of the visual channel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30968352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.