Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30968352›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019

Prediction of laparoscopic procedure duration using unlabeled, multimodal sensor data.

Sebastian Bodenstedt, Martin Wagner, Lars Mündermann, Hannes Kenngott, Beat Müller-Stich, Michael Breucha, Sören Torge Mees, Jürgen Weitz, Stefanie Speidel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Improving preoperative prediction of surgery duration.BMC health services research · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Patch-based classification of gallbladder wall vascularity from laparoscopic images using deep learning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastian BodenstedtDepartment for Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Sebastian.Bodenstedt@nct-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-9729
Martin WagnerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lars MündermannKARL STORZ SE & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Hannes KenngottDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Beat Müller-StichDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael BreuchaDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sören Torge MeesDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen WeitzDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Stefanie SpeidelDepartment for Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe course of surgical procedures is often unpredictable, making it difficult to estimate the duration of procedures beforehand. This uncertainty makes scheduling surgical procedures a difficult task. A context-aware method that analyses the workflow of an intervention online and automatically predicts the remaining duration would alleviate these problems. As basis for such an estimate, information regarding the current state of the intervention is a requirement.

methodsToday, the operating room contains a diverse range of sensors. During laparoscopic interventions, the endoscopic video stream is an ideal source of such information. Extracting quantitative information from the video is challenging though, due to its high dimensionality. Other surgical devices (e.g., insufflator, lights, etc.) provide data streams which are, in contrast to the video stream, more compact and easier to quantify. Though whether such streams offer sufficient information for estimating the duration of surgery is uncertain. In this paper, we propose and compare methods, based on convolutional neural networks, for continuously predicting the duration of laparoscopic interventions based on unlabeled data, such as from endoscopic image and surgical device streams.

resultsThe methods are evaluated on 80 recorded laparoscopic interventions of various types, for which surgical device data and the endoscopic video streams are available. Here the combined method performs best with an overall average error of 37% and an average halftime error of approximately 28%.

conclusionIn this paper, we present, to our knowledge, the first approach for online procedure duration prediction using unlabeled endoscopic video data and surgical device data in a laparoscopic setting. Furthermore, we show that a method incorporating both vision and device data performs better than methods based only on vision, while methods only based on tool usage and surgical device data perform poorly, showing the importance of the visual channel.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyOperative TimeWorkflowHumansNeural Networks, ComputerOperating RoomsDuration predictionSensorORSurgical workflow analyses

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.