Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30968216›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2019

Spatial scaling in multiscale models: methods for coupling agent-based and finite-element models of wound healing.

Jia-Jye Lee, Lee Talman, Shayn M Peirce, Jeffrey W Holmes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multi-scale models of lung fibrosis.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jia-Jye LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Lee TalmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Shayn M PeirceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jeffrey W HolmesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. holmes@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Multiscale Models of Cardiac Growth, Remodeling, and Myocardial InfarctionU01HL127654 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOLMES, JEFFREY W · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Computational Modeling of Scar Formation After Myocardial InfarctionR01HL116449 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOLMES, JEFFREY W · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116449NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL127654NIH HHS R01 HL-116449NIH HHS U01 HL-127654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiscale models that couple agent-based modeling (ABM) and finite-element modeling (FEM) allow the dynamic simulation of tissue remodeling and wound healing, with mechanical environment influencing cellular behaviors even as tissue remodeling modifies mechanics. One of the challenges in coupling ABM to FEM is that these two domains typically employ grid or element sizes that differ by several orders of magnitude. Here, we develop and demonstrate an interpolation-based method for mapping between ABM and FEM domains of different resolutions that is suitable for linear and nonlinear FEM meshes and balances accuracy with computational demands. We then explore the effects of refining the FEM mesh and the ABM grid in the setting of a fully coupled model. ABM grid refinement studies showed unexpected effects of grid size whenever cells were present at a high enough density for crowding to affect proliferation and migration. In contrast to an FE-only model, refining the FE mesh in the coupled model increased strain differences between adjacent finite elements. Allowing strain-dependent feedback on collagen turnover magnified the effects of regional heterogeneity, producing highly nonlinear spatial and temporal responses. Our results suggest that the choice of both ABM grid and FEM mesh density in coupled models must be guided by experimental data and accompanied by careful grid and mesh refinement studies in the individual domains as well as the fully coupled model.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisModels, BiologicalSystems AnalysisWound HealingAnimalsComputer SimulationRatsTime FactorsAgent-based modelCollagenComputational modelFibroblastFinite-element modelMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID30968216
PMCPMC8427702
OpenAlexW2936354951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.