Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30968176›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Inter-population variation of histomorphometric variables used in the estimation of age-at-death.

D Botha, N Lynnerup, M Steyn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D BothaHuman Variation and Identification Research Unit, School of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 2nd Floor, WITS Health Sciences Building, 7 York Road, Parktown,, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa. deona.botha@gmail.com.
N LynnerupDepartment of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
M SteynHuman Variation and Identification Research Unit, School of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 2nd Floor, WITS Health Sciences Building, 7 York Road, Parktown,, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.

Funding

National Research Foundation Unknown
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population variation of several microscopic structures used in age-at-death estimation was assessed for three different population samples. The aim of the study was to determine if the need exists for population-specific standards when dealing with individuals of African and European origin. A total sample 223 bone sections from the anterior cortex of the femur (n = 99 black South Africans, n = 94 white South Africans and n = 30 Danish individuals) were analysed using a stereological protocol. Variables assessed included the average number of osteons per grid area (OPD), osteon size and Haversian canal size. ANCOVA was employed for assessment of statistically significant differences. The results indicated that OPD differed significantly between the three groups, but that osteon size was similar for all individuals. Haversian canal size showed unpredictable changes with age and high levels of variation, making it unsuitable to use for age estimation as a single factor. As there are conflicting opinions in the literature on whether to use population-specific equations for the estimation of age-at-death or not, this paper provided additional insight into the use of specific variables and its related variation between groups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge Determination by SkeletonAnalysis of VarianceBiological Variation, PopulationBlack PeopleCadaverFemaleFemurHaversian SystemHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisWhite PeopleFemurHaversian canal sizeOPDOsteon sizeStereology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.