Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30968175›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2019

Psychopathological symptoms associated with synthetic cannabinoid use: a comparison with natural cannabis.

Vincent T Mensen, Annabel Vreeker, Johan Nordgren, Amanda Atkinson, Rafael de la Torre, Magi Farré, Johannes G Ramaekers, Tibor M Brunt

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A Review of Cases of Marijuana and Violence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  12. New psychoactive substances: a review and updates.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Vincent T MensenDepartment of Drug Monitoring, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annabel VreekerUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Psychiatry, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johan NordgrenDepartment of Social Work, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Amanda AtkinsonPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Rafael de la TorreIntegrative Pharmacology and Systems Neurosciences, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Magi FarréIntegrative Pharmacology and Systems Neurosciences, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Johannes G RamaekersDepartment of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tibor M BruntDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. orbit.biomed@gmail.com.
Hospital del Mar Research Institute · ESLiverpool John Moores University · GBMaastricht University · NLMalmö University · SEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council HOME/2014/JDRU/AG/DRUG/7082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSynthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are a class of new psychoactive substances that have been rapidly evolving around the world throughout recent years. Many different synthetic cannabinoid analogues are on the consumer market and sold under misleading names, like "spice" or "incense." A limited number of studies have reported serious health effects associated with SC use. In this study, we compared clinical and subclinical psychopathological symptoms associated with SC use and natural cannabis (NC) use.

methodsA convenience sample of 367 NC and SC users was recruited online, including four validated psychometric questionnaires: The Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Altman Mania Scale (Altman), and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The two groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and covariance (ANCOVA), chi

resultsThe SC user group did not differ in age from the NC user group (27.7 years), but contained less females (21% and 30%, respectively). SC users scored higher than NC users on all used psychometric measures, indicating a higher likelihood of drug abuse, sleep problems, (hypo)manic symptoms, and the nine dimensions comprising the BSI, somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. Odds ratios (95% CI) for the SC user group vs NC user group were, respectively, drug dependence 3.56 (1.77-7.16), (severe) insomnia 5.01 (2.10-11.92), (hypo-)mania 5.18 (2.04-13.14), and BSI psychopathology 5.21 (2.96-9.17). DISCUSSION: This study shows that SC use is associated with increased mental health symptomatology compared to NC use.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCannabinoidsEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychopathologySurveys and QuestionnairesSynthetic DrugsYoung AdultCannabinoidsSynthetic DrugsAltmanBSICannabisDUDITISIMental healthPsychiatryPsychologyQuestionnaireSpiceSynthetic cannabis

Identifiers

PMID30968175
PMCPMC6695363
OpenAlexW2936797574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.