Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30968160›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2019

Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality: an example in sorghum.

Julio G Velazco, Marcos Malosetti, Colleen H Hunt, Emma S Mace, David R Jordan, Fred A van Eeuwijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julio G VelazcoDepartment of Plant Breeding, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), EEA Pergamino, B2700WAA, Pergamino, Argentina.
Marcos MalosettiBiometris, Wageningen University and Research, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Colleen H HuntQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Hermitage Research Facility, Warwick, QLD, 4370, Australia.
Emma S MaceQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Hermitage Research Facility, Warwick, QLD, 4370, Australia.
David R JordanQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Hermitage Research Facility, Warwick, QLD, 4370, Australia.
Fred A van EeuwijkBiometris, Wageningen University and Research, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. fred.vaneeuwijk@wur.nl.

Funding

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Res. DN 1126/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageThe use of a kinship matrix integrating pedigree- and marker-based relationships optimized the performance of genomic prediction in sorghum, especially for traits of lower heritability. Selection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree-genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPedigreePlant BreedingGenomicsGenotypePhenotypeSorghum

Identifiers

PMID30968160
PMCPMC6588709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.