ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2019
Material and regenerative properties of an osteon-mimetic cortical bone-like scaffold.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic Nanoparticles for Bone Regeneration: Construction Strategies and Therapeutic Mechanisms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D-printed scaffold technologies for bone defect repair: materials, biomechanics, and clinical prospects.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Article
- Recent advancement in vascularized tissue-engineered bone based on materials design and modification.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Spheroid co-culture of BMSCs with osteocytes yields ring-shaped bone-like tissue that enhances alveolar bone regeneration.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Experimental study of a 3D printed permanent implantable porous Ta-coated bone plate for fracture fixation.Bioactive materials · 2022Article
- Osteon: Structure, Turnover, and Regeneration.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022Review
- Integrating pore architectures to evaluate vascularization efficacy in silicate-based bioceramic scaffolds.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- Porous silicon carbide coated with tantalum as potential material for bone implants.Regenerative biomaterials · 2020Article
- In vivo bone regeneration assessment of offset and gradient melt electrowritten (MEW) PCL scaffolds.Biomaterials research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this work was to fabricate a rigid, resorbable and osteoconductive scaffold by mimicking the hierarchical structure of the cortical bone. Aligned peptide-functionalize nanofiber microsheets were generated with calcium phosphate (CaP) content similar to that of the natural cortical bone. Next, the CaP-rich fibrous microsheets were wrapped around a microneedle to form a laminated microtube mimicking the structure of an osteon. Then, a set of the osteon-mimetic microtubes were assembled around a solid rod and the assembly was annealed to fuse the microtubes and form a shell. Next, an array of circular microholes were drilled on the outer surface of the shell to generate a cortical bone-like scaffold with an interconnected network of Haversian- and Volkmann-like microcanals. The CaP content, porosity and density of the bone-mimetic microsheets were 240 wt%, 8% and 1.9 g/ml, respectively, which were close to that of natural cortical bone. The interconnected network of microcanals in the fused microtubes increased permeability of a model protein in the scaffold. The cortical scaffold induced osteogenesis and vasculogenesis in the absence of bone morphogenetic proteins upon seeding with human mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial colony-forming cells. The localized and timed-release of morphogenetic factors significantly increased the extent of osteogenic and vasculogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial colony-forming cells in the cortical scaffold. The cortical bone-mimetic nature of the cellular construct provided balanced rigidity, resorption rate, osteoconductivity and nutrient diffusivity to support vascularization and osteogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.