Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967962›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2019

Fibroadhesive scarring of grafted collagen scaffolds interferes with implant-host neural tissue integration and bridging in experimental spinal cord injury.

Haktan Altinova, Sebastian Hammes, Moniek Palm, Jose Gerardo-Nava, Pascal Achenbach, Ronald Deumens, Emmanuel Hermans, Tobias Führmann, Arne Boecker, Sabien Geraldine Antonia van Neerven and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Open-Spaced Ridged Hydrogel Scaffolds Containing TiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Haktan AltinovaDepartment of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Sebastian HammesInstitute of Neuropathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Moniek PalmInstitute of Neuropathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Jose Gerardo-NavaInstitute of Neuropathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Pascal AchenbachInstitute of Neuropathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Ronald DeumensInstitute of Neuropathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Emmanuel HermansInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Tobias FührmannDonnelly Centre for Cellular & Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Arne BoeckerDepartment of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Centre Trauma Centre, BG Trauma Centre Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Sabien Geraldine Antonia van NeervenInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Ahmet BozkurtDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Burn Centre, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Joachim WeisInstitute of Neuropathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Gary Anthony BrookInstitute of Neuropathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DEUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in a devastating and permanent loss of function, and is currently an incurable condition. It is generally accepted that future intervention strategies will require combinational approaches, including bioengineered scaffolds, to support axon growth across tissue scarring and cystic cavitation. Previously, we demonstrated that implantation of a microporous type-I collagen scaffold into an experimental model of SCI was capable of supporting functional recovery in the absence of extensive implant-host neural tissue integration. Here, we demonstrate the reactive host cellular responses that may be detrimental to neural tissue integration after implantation of collagen scaffolds into unilateral resection injuries of the adult rat spinal cord. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated scattered fibroblast-like cell infiltration throughout the scaffolds as well as the presence of variable layers of densely packed cells, the fine processes of which extended along the graft-host interface. Few reactive astroglial or regenerating axonal profiles could be seen traversing this layer. Such encapsulation-type behaviour around bioengineered scaffolds impedes the integration of host neural tissues and reduces the intended bridging role of the implant. Characterization of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underpinning this behaviour will be pivotal in the future design of collagen-based bridging scaffolds intended for regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

astrogliosisCNS-scarringencapsulationfibrosisscaffoldspinal cord injurytype-I collagen

Identifiers

PMID30967962
PMCPMC6447003
OpenAlexW2912069539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.