ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2019
Paclitaxel for relapsed small-cell lung cancer patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease during chemotherapy for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- [A Review of Drug Therapy of Lung Cancer with Interstitial Lung Disease].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although first-line chemotherapy is highly sensitive against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), most patients subsequently experience disease progression. Topotecan is the standard therapy for sensitive-relapsed SCLC patients, and subgroup analysis of a randomized phase III trial suggests that amrubicin is effective for refractory-relapsed SCLC. However, because of the lack of the evidence based on clinical trials, the effectiveness of systemic chemotherapy for relapsed SCLC patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) is unclear. In the presentstudy, 17 relapsed SCLC patients with IIPs who received a paclitaxel (PTX)-containing regimen as a second-line chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The overall response rate and the disease control rate of the PTX-containing regimens were 29.4 and 47.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and the overall survival of the regimens were 2.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6-3.6 months] and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.3-14.0 months), respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 12 (70.6%) and 2 (11.8%) patients, respectively. During the treatment period, acute exacerbation (AE) of IIPs was observed in five patients (29.4%). Treatment-associated fatality was observed in 1 patient with febrile neutropenia and in 1 patient with AE of IIPs. PTX had promising anti-tumor activity against refractory-relapsed SCLC with IIPs. However, the survival benefit of the treatment was limited because of the high incidence of AE of IIPs and treatment-related death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.