Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967881›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019

Holm Oak Somatic Embryogenesis: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

María Teresa Martínez, María Del Carmen San-José, Isabel Arrillaga, Vanesa Cano, Marián Morcillo, María José Cernadas, Elena Corredoira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Advances inFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Multiomics Molecular Research into the Recalcitrant and OrphanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. First Report on Genome Editing via Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Genetic Transformation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María Teresa MartínezInstituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia (IIAG-CSIC), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María Del Carmen San-JoséInstituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia (IIAG-CSIC), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Isabel ArrillagaISIC/ERI Biotec/Med, Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Farmacia, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Vanesa CanoInstituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia (IIAG-CSIC), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Marián MorcilloISIC/ERI Biotec/Med, Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Farmacia, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
María José CernadasInstituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia (IIAG-CSIC), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Elena CorredoiraInstituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia (IIAG-CSIC), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cryopreservationgenetic transformationoak declineplant regenerationQuercus ilexsomatic embryos

Identifiers

PMID30967881
PMCPMC6438927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.