Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967847›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Diverse Environmental Microbiota as a Tool to Augment Biodiversity in Urban Landscaping Materials.

Nan Hui, Mira Grönroos, Marja I Roslund, Anirudra Parajuli, Heli K Vari, Laura Soininen, Olli H Laitinen, Aki Sinkkonen, ADELE Research Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distinct skin microbiome signatures in Black and White children with food allergy and asthma.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nan HuiNature-Based Solutions Research Group, Ecology and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland.
Mira GrönroosNature-Based Solutions Research Group, Ecology and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland.
Marja I RoslundNature-Based Solutions Research Group, Ecology and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland.
Anirudra ParajuliNature-Based Solutions Research Group, Ecology and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland.
Heli K VariNature-Based Solutions Research Group, Ecology and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland.
Laura SoininenNature-Based Solutions Research Group, Ecology and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland.
Olli H LaitinenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Aki SinkkonenNature-Based Solutions Research Group, Ecology and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland.
ADELE Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities typically lead to simplified urban diversity, which in turn reduces microbial exposure and increases the risk to urban dwellers from non-communicable diseases. To overcome this, we developed a microbial inoculant from forest and agricultural materials that resembles microbiota in organic soils. Three different sand materials (sieved, safety, and sandbox) commonly used in playgrounds and other public spaces were enriched with 5% of the inoculant. Skin microbiota on fingers (identified from bacterial 16S rDNA determined using Illumina MiSeq sequencing) was compared after touching non-enriched and microbial inoculant-enriched sands. Exposure to the non-enriched materials changed the skin bacterial community composition in distinct ways. When the inoculant was added to the materials, the overall shift in community composition was larger and the differences between different sand materials almost disappeared. Inoculant-enriched sand materials increased bacterial diversity and richness but did not affect evenness at the OTU level on skin. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was higher after touching inoculant-enriched compared to non-enriched sand materials. The relative abundance of opportunistic pathogens on skin was 40-50% before touching sand materials, but dropped to 14 and 4% after touching standard and inoculant-enriched sand materials, respectively. When individual genera were analyzed,

Indexed as

bacterial diversitymicrobial inoculantopportunistic pathogensafety directive EN1177safety sandsand box sandsieved sandskin microbiota

Identifiers

PMID30967847
PMCPMC6438878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.