ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
A Temperament-Attachment-Mentalization-Based (TAM) Theory of Personality and Its Disorders.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Depression in adolescence and young adulthood: the difficulty to integrate motivational/emotional systems.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Attachment and Mindfulness as Mediators in the Relationship Between Childhood Adversity and Personality Outcomes.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2023Article
- Mentalization, Oxytocin, and Cortisol in the General Population.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The impact of outcome expectancy on therapy outcome in adolescents with borderline personality disorder.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2022Article
- The Relationship Among Mentalization, Mindfulness, Working Memory, and Schizotypal Personality Traits in the General Population.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Narrative coherence of autobiographical memories in women with borderline personality disorder and associations with childhood adversity.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2021Article
- Future directions in personality pathology development research from a trainee perspective: Suggestions for theory, methodology, and practice.Current opinion in psychology · 2021Review
- How Our Caregivers Shape Who We Are: The Seven Dimensions of Attachment at the Core of Personality.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Mentalized Affectivity Scale (MAS): Development and validation of the Italian version.PloS one · 2021Article
- Relationship between Mentalizing and Working Conditions in Health Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theories of personality and its disorders need, from time to time, to be revised and updated according to new empirical and conceptual developments. Such development has taken place in the realms of affective neuroscience, evolution, and social cognition. In this article, we outline a new personality theory, which claims that phenomena we usually ascribe to the concept personality are best understood by postulating a web consisting of three major constituents: temperament (mainly primary emotions), attachment, and self-consciousness (mentalizing). We describe these constituents, their neurobiological underpinnings, the subjective experiences they evoke, and their behavioral implications. We discuss the relevance of the espoused theory in the field of personality disorders with references to borderline, narcissistic, and avoidant personality disorders as well as the DSM-5 alternative model. Implications for social psychology, psychotherapy, and common sense self-understanding are outlined. The theory aims to bridge previous contradictions between natural sciences and hermeneutics by its propositions of the evolution of self-consciousness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.