Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2019
Weight loss at your fingertips: personalized nutrition with fasting glucose and insulin using a novel statistical approach.
Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nordic dietary patterns and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomised controlled trials.Diabetologia · 2022Pooled it
- Use of Metabotyping to Identify Individuals With Different Triglyceride Response Curves After Intake of High-Fat Meals.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of Food-Intake Behavior in a Healthy Population: Personalized vs. One-Size-Fits-All.Nutrients · 2020Trial
- Metabolic Phenotypes, Genotypes, and Gut Microbiome Signatures in Obesity: Implications for Precision Nutrition Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes Prevention.Nutrition reviews · 2026Review
- Mixed-effects neural network modelling to predict longitudinal trends in fasting plasma glucose.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Should carbohydrate-modified diets be the first option for weight loss in people with impaired glucose metabolism? A scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024Article
- Precision Nutrition to Improve Risk Factors of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.Current nutrition reports · 2023Review
- Post hoc subgroup analysis and identification-learning more from existing data.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Article
- Effects of high-intensity interval training program on pituartry function in basketball players: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- The role of baseline serum 25(OH)D concentration for a potential personalized vitamin D supplementation.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Article
- Appraisal of Triglyceride-Related Markers as Early Predictors of Metabolic Outcomes in the PREVIEW Lifestyle Intervention: A ControlledFrontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Data integration for prediction of weight loss in randomized controlled dietary trials.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Diet and exercise in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2020 · on this mapReview
- The role of dietary protein in obesity.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020Review
- Potential Cardiometabolic Health Benefits of Full-Fat Dairy: The Evidence Base.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Perspective: Metabotyping-A Potential Personalized Nutrition Strategy for Precision Prevention of Cardiometabolic Disease.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- What is the promise of personalised nutrition?Journal of nutritional scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPrecision medicine is changing the way people are diagnosed and treated into a more personalized approach. Using a novel statistical approach, we demonstrate how two diets cause differential weight loss depending on pre-treatment fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin (FI) levels. SUBJECTS/
methodsOne hundred and eighty-one overweight people with increased waist circumference were randomly assigned to receive an ad libitum New Nordic Diet (NND) high in dietary fiber and whole grain or an Average Danish (Western) Diet (ADD) for 26 weeks. All foods were provided free of charge. Body weight was measured throughout the study and blood was drawn before randomization from where FPG and FI were analyzed. Weight was described by linear mixed models including biomarker (FPG or FI) diet group interactions. Individualized predictions were estimated as contrasts of intercepts and slopes of pre-treatment biomarkers.
resultsEvery mmol/L increase in baseline FPG predicted a between-diet difference of 3.00 (1.18;4.83, n = 181, P = 0.001) kg larger weight loss from choosing NND over ADD. For instance, a baseline FPG level of 4.7 mmol/L would lead to an average of 1.42 kg larger weight loss on NND vs. ADD (above 0.41 kg with 95% certainty), whereas the average effect size would be 8.33 kg (above 5.50 kg with 95% certainty) among subjects with FPG level of 7.0 mmol/L. Among individuals with FPG <5.6 mmol/L, each pmol/L lower baseline FI predicted a 0.039 (95% CI 0.017;0.061, n = 143, P < 0.001) kg larger weight loss from choosing NND over ADD.
conclusionsUse of pre-treatment FPG and FI led to truly individualized predictions of treatment effect of introducing more fiber and whole grain in the diet on weight loss, ranging from almost no effect to losing >8 kg. These findings suggest that this novel statistical approach has great potential when re-evaluating data from existing randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.