Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967538›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

The sponge microbiome within the greater coral reef microbial metacommunity.

Daniel F R Cleary, Thomas Swierts, Francisco J R C Coelho, Ana R M Polónia, Yusheng M Huang, Marina R S Ferreira, Sumaitt Putchakarn, Luis Carvalheiro, Esther van der Ent, Jinn-Pyng Ueng and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel F R ClearyDepartment of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. cleary@ua.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6143-3390
Thomas SwiertsMarine Biodiversity, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Francisco J R C CoelhoDepartment of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Ana R M PolóniaDepartment of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3381-7677
Yusheng M HuangTropical Island Sustainable Development Research Center, National Penghu University of Science and Technology, 300 Liu-Ho Rd., Magong City, Penghu 880, Taiwan.
Marina R S FerreiraDepartment of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0470-9677
Sumaitt PutchakarnInstitute of Marine Science, Burapha University, Chon Buri, 20131, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-5640
Luis CarvalheiroCESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8113-3152
Esther van der EntMarine Biodiversity, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9095-1018
Jinn-Pyng UengTropical Island Sustainable Development Research Center, National Penghu University of Science and Technology, 300 Liu-Ho Rd., Magong City, Penghu 880, Taiwan.
Newton C M GomesDepartment of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1934-0091
Nicole J de VoogdMarine Biodiversity, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
University of Aveiro · PTLeiden University · NLNational Penghu University of Science and Technology · TWBurapha University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much recent marine microbial research has focused on sponges, but very little is known about how the sponge microbiome fits in the greater coral reef microbial metacommunity. Here, we present an extensive survey of the prokaryote communities of a wide range of biotopes from Indo-Pacific coral reef environments. We find a large variation in operational taxonomic unit (OTU) richness, with algae, chitons, stony corals and sea cucumbers housing the most diverse prokaryote communities. These biotopes share a higher percentage and number of OTUs with sediment and are particularly enriched in members of the phylum Planctomycetes. Despite having lower OTU richness, sponges share the greatest percentage (>90%) of OTUs with >100 sequences with the environment (sediment and/or seawater) although there is considerable variation among sponge species. Our results, furthermore, highlight that prokaryote microorganisms are shared among multiple coral reef biotopes, and that, although compositionally distinct, the sponge prokaryote community does not appear to be as sponge-specific as previously thought.

Indexed as

Coral ReefsMicrobiotaAnimalsAquatic OrganismsBacteriaDNA, BacterialGeologic SedimentsPoriferaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeawaterTaiwanThailandDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30967538
PMCPMC6456735
OpenAlexW2934166939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.