ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Speaking of gender bias.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Gender imbalances in the editorial activities of a selective journal run by academic editors.PloS one · 2023Article
- Gendered citation patterns among the scientific elite.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- A Year into the Pandemic: An Update on Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Medicine.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2022Review
- Brazilian female researchers do not publish less despite an academic structure that deepens sex gap.PloS one · 2022Article
- Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars' work.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Gender Bias in the News: A Scalable Topic Modelling and Visualization Framework.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.PloS one · 2021Article
- Towards diversity in science - a glance at gender disparity in the Brazilian Society of Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC).Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021Article
- Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals.Science advances · 2021Article
- The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2020Review
- Gender-based pairings influence cooperative expectations and behaviours.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.