Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967405›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2019

A guided and unguided internet- and mobile-based intervention for chronic pain: health economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Sarah Paganini, Jiaxi Lin, Fanny Kählke, Claudia Buntrock, Delia Leiding, David D Ebert, Harald Baumeister

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah PaganiniDepartment of Sports and Sport Science, Sport Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jiaxi LinDepartment of Sports and Sport Science, Sport Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Fanny KählkeDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Claudia BuntrockDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-5455
Delia LeidingDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
David D EbertDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6820-0146
Harald BaumeisterDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims at evaluating the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a guided and unguided internet-based intervention for chronic pain patients (ACTonPain

designThis is a health economic evaluation alongside a three-arm randomised controlled trial from a societal perspective. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 9 weeks and 6 months after randomisation.

settingParticipants were recruited through online and offline strategies and in collaboration with a health insurance company.

participants302 adults (≥18 years, pain for at least 6 months) were randomly allocated to one of the three groups (ACTonPain

interventionsACTonPain consists of seven modules and is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. ACTonPain PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcomes of the cost-effectiveness and the cost-utility analyses were meaningful change in pain interference (treatment response) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively. Economic evaluation estimates were the incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratio (ICER/ICUR).

resultsAt 6-month follow-up, treatment response and QALYs were highest in ACTonPain

conclusionsDepending on society's willingness-to-pay, ACTonPain is a potentially cost-effective adjunct to established pain treatment. ACTonPain TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00006183.

Indexed as

InternetAcceptance and Commitment TherapyChronic PainCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGermanyHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeWaiting Listschronic paincost-effectivenesscost-utilityehealthhealth economic evaluationinternet-and mobile-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID30967405
PMCPMC6500312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.