Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967135›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Impact of compression stockings on leg swelling after arthroscopy - a prospective randomised pilot study.

Tina S Tischer, Sebastian Oye, Robert Lenz, Peter Kreuz, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Rainer Bader, Thomas Tischer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02096562 (Prospective Randomized Assessment of Postsurgical Swelling Applying Compression Stockings vs. Conventional Wrapping After Outpatient Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02096562 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective Randomized Assessment of Postsurgical Swelling Applying Compression Stockings vs. Conventional Wrapping After Outpatient Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RostockRan2013 to 2015Enrolled27ConditionsKnee Pain SwellingArmsPatients use compression stockings for 10 days after surgery, normal therapy - no compression stockings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tina S TischerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Sebastian OyeDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Robert LenzDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medicine Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Peter KreuzDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medicine Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Wolfram MittelmeierDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medicine Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Rainer BaderDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medicine Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Thomas TischerDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medicine Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany. thomas.tischer@med.uni-rostock.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3942-0235
University of Rostock · DEAsklepios Klinik Barmbek · DEAsklepios Kliniken Bad Abbach · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-operative limb swelling may negatively affect the outcome of arthroscopic surgery and prolong rehabilitation. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effect of compression stockings versus no compression on post-operative swelling and pain in the early post-operative phase.

methodsA single-centre, randomised controlled trial was performed. Patients who underwent minor knee arthroscopy were randomised to wear class II compression stockings (23-32 mmHg) (CS) or no compression stockings (NCS) immediately post-operatively for ten days. All patients received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at prophylactic dosage. The primary outcome variable was post-operative swelling of the limb, quantified by using an optical 3D measurement system (Bodytronic© 600). Pain was rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS). From a total of 76 patients assessed, 19 patients were eligible for final analysis. The trial followed the CONSORT criteria, was registered at clinicaltrial.gov and approved by the local ethics committee.

resultsThe circumference at the middle thigh (cF) was significantly different between groups at day 10 (p = 0.032; circumference - 1.35 ± 2.15% (CS) and + 0.79 ± 3.71% (NCS)). Significant differences were also noted around the knee (cD) at day 10 (p = 0.026) and a significant trend at cD and at the mid lower leg (cB1) at day 4. The volume of the thigh was also different with marked difference between days 1 and 4 between the two groups (p = 0.021; volume + 0.54 ± 2.03% (CS) and + 4.17 ± 4.67 (NCS)). Pain was lower in compression group (not statistically significant).

conclusionsPost-operative limb swelling can be reduced significantly by wearing compression stockings in the early post-operative phase when compared to not wearing stockings. This may improve the rehabilitation process after arthroscopic surgery. The optimal duration of compression therapy seems to be between three and ten days.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02096562 , date of registration 11.11.2013).

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthroscopyEdemaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodStockings, CompressionTreatment OutcomeComplicationsCompression therapyKnee arthroscopyPost-operative swelling

Identifiers

PMID30967135
PMCPMC6456960
OpenAlexW2943549608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.