ArticleBMC genomics2019
A distance-type measure approach to the analysis of copy number variation in DNA sequencing data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe next generation sequencing technology allows us to obtain a large amount of short DNA sequence (DNA-seq) reads at a genome-wide level. DNA-seq data have been increasingly collected during the recent years. Count-type data analysis is a widely used approach for DNA-seq data. However, the related data pre-processing is based on the moving window method, in which a window size need to be defined in order to obtain count-type data. Furthermore, useful information can be reduced after data pre-processing for count-type data.
resultsIn this study, we propose to analyze DNA-seq data based on the related distance-type measure. Distances are measured in base pairs (bps) between two adjacent alignments of short reads mapped to a reference genome. Our experimental data based simulation study confirms the advantages of distance-type measure approach in both detection power and detection accuracy. Furthermore, we propose artificial censoring for the distance data so that distances larger than a given value are considered potential outliers. Our purpose is to simplify the pre-processing of DNA-seq data. Statistically, we consider a mixture of right censored geometric distributions to model the distance data. Additionally, to reduce the GC-content bias, we extend the mixture model to a mixture of generalized linear models (GLMs). The estimation of model can be achieved by the Newton-Raphson algorithm as well as the Expectation-Maximization (E-M) algorithm. We have conducted simulations to evaluate the performance of our approach. Based on the rank based inverse normal transformation of distance data, we can obtain the related z-values for a follow-up analysis. For an illustration, an application to the DNA-seq data from a pair of normal and tumor cell lines is presented with a change-point analysis of z-values to detect DNA copy number alterations.
conclusionOur distance-type measure approach is novel. It does not require either a fixed or a sliding window procedure for generating count-type data. Its advantages have been demonstrated by our simulation studies and its practical usefulness has been illustrated by an experimental data application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.