Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967078›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Higher-level pattern features provide additional information to birds when recognizing and rejecting parasitic eggs.

Mary Caswell Stoddard, Benedict G Hogan, Martin Stevens, Claire N Spottiswoode

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Avian egg and nestling detection in the wild: should we rely on visual models or behavioural experiments?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: a call for integration.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary Caswell Stoddard1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University , Princeton, NJ 08544 , USA.
Benedict G Hogan1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University , Princeton, NJ 08544 , USA.
Martin Stevens2 Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter , Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE , UK.
Claire N Spottiswoode3 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 3EJ , UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014109/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a recent explosion of research on pattern recognition, in both neuroscience and computer vision, we lack a basic understanding of how most animals perceive and respond to patterns in the wild. Avian brood parasites and their hosts provide an ideal study system for investigating the mechanisms of pattern recognition. The cuckoo finch, Anomalospiza imberbis, and its host the tawny-flanked prinia, Prinia subflava, lay highly polymorphic eggs with a great deal of variation in colour and patterning, with the cuckoo finch capable of close egg mimicry. Behavioural experiments in Zambia have previously shown that prinias use colour and multiple 'low-level' (occurring in early stages of visual processing) pattern attributes, derived from spatial frequency analysis, when rejecting foreign eggs. Here, we explore the extent to which host birds might also use 'higher-level' pattern attributes, derived from a feature detection algorithm, to make rejection decisions. Using a SIFT-based pattern recognition algorithm, NaturePatternMatch, we show that hosts are more likely to reject a foreign egg if its higher-level pattern features-which capture information about the shape and orientation of markings-differ from those of the host eggs. A revised statistical model explains about 37% variance in egg rejection behaviour, and differences in colour, low-level and higher-level pattern features all predict rejection, accounting for 42, 44 and 14% of the explained variance, respectively. Thus, higher-level pattern features provide a small but measurable improvement to the original model and may be especially useful when colour and low-level pattern features provide hosts with little information. Understanding the relative importance of low- and higher-level pattern features is a valuable goal for future work on animal coloration, especially in the contexts of mimicry, camouflage and individual recognition. This article is part of the theme issue 'The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: from mechanism to pattern'.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsNesting BehaviorPattern Recognition, VisualAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleFinchesRecognition, PsychologySongbirdsZambiaanimal colorationavian visionbrood parasitismcoevolutionmimicrypattern recognition

Identifiers

PMID30967078
PMCPMC6388034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.