Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967061›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2019

Replicating the complexity of natural surfaces: technique validation and applications for biomimetics, ecology and evolution.

Charchit Kumar, Alejandro Palacios, Venkata A Surapaneni, Georg Bold, Marc Thielen, Erik Licht, Timothy E Higham, Thomas Speck, Vincent Le Houérou

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the attachment of the Mediterranean medicinal leech (Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charchit Kumar1 Institut Charles Sadron, CNRS UPR022, Université de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France.
Alejandro Palacios1 Institut Charles Sadron, CNRS UPR022, Université de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France.
Venkata A Surapaneni2 Plant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany.
Georg Bold2 Plant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany.
Marc Thielen2 Plant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany.
Erik Licht7 Basell Deutschland GmbH, LyondellBasell Industries , Frankfurt a.M , Germany.
Timothy E Higham2 Plant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany.
Thomas Speck2 Plant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany.
Vincent Le Houérou1 Institut Charles Sadron, CNRS UPR022, Université de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surfaces of animals, plants and abiotic structures are not only important for organismal survival, but they have also inspired countless biomimetic and industrial applications. Additionally, the surfaces of animals and plants exhibit an unprecedented level of diversity, and animals often move on the surface of plants. Replicating these surfaces offers a number of advantages, such as preserving a surface that is likely to degrade over time, controlling for non-structural aspects of surfaces, such as compliance and chemistry, and being able to produce large areas of a small surface. In this paper, we compare three replication techniques among a number of species of plants, a technical surface and a rock. We then use two model parameters (cross-covariance function ratio and relative topography difference) to develop a unique method for quantitatively evaluating the quality of the replication. Finally, we outline future directions that can employ highly accurate surface replications, including ecological and evolutionary studies, biomechanical experiments, industrial applications and improving haptic properties of bioinspired surfaces. The recent advances associated with surface replication and imaging technology have formed a foundation on which to incorporate surface information into biological sciences and to improve industrial and biomimetic applications. This article is part of the theme issue 'Bioinspired materials and surfaces for green science and technology'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBiomimeticsEcologyPlantsSurface Propertiesbiomimeticshapticsmicrostructuringpolymersreplication

Identifiers

PMID30967061
PMCPMC6335282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.