ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2019
Application of the extreme scaling computing pattern on multiscale fusion plasma modelling.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiscale modelling, simulation and computing: from the desktop to the exascale.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extreme scaling pattern of the ComPat project is applied to a multi-scale workflow relevant to the magnetically confined fusion problem. This workflow combines transport, turbulence and equilibrium codes (together with additional auxiliaries such as initial conditions and numerical module), which aims at calculating the behaviour of a fusion plasma on long (transport) time scales based on information from much faster (turbulence) time scales. Initial findings of profile measurements are reported in this paper and indicate that, depending on the chosen performance metric for defining 'cost', such as time to completion, efficiency and total energy consumption of the mutliscale workflow, different choices on the number of cores would be made when determining the optimal execution configuration. A variant of the workflow which increases the inherent parallelism is presented, and shown to produce equivalent results at (typically) lower cost compared with the original workflow. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multiscale modelling, simulation and computing: from the desktop to the exascale'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.