Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30967028›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Signal pathways involved in microbe-nematode interactions provide new insights into the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes.

Lian-Ming Liang, Cheng-Gang Zou, Jianping Xu, Ke-Qin Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characterizing the Role ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Characterization of regulatory genesFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. GeneFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biocontrol potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lian-Ming Liang1 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan and The Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University , Kunming 650091 , People's Republic of China.
Cheng-Gang Zou1 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan and The Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University , Kunming 650091 , People's Republic of China.
Jianping Xu1 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan and The Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University , Kunming 650091 , People's Republic of China.
Ke-Qin Zhang1 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan and The Key Laboratory for Southwest Microbial Diversity of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University , Kunming 650091 , People's Republic of China.
Yunnan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) cause severe damage to agricultural crops worldwide. As most chemical nematicides have negative environmental side effects, there is a pressing need for developing efficient biocontrol methods. Nematophagous microbes, the natural enemies of nematodes, are potential biocontrol agents against PPNs. These natural enemies include both bacteria and fungi and they use diverse methods to infect and kill nematodes. For instance, nematode-trapping fungi can sense host signals and produce special trapping devices to capture nematodes, whereas endo-parasitic fungi can kill nematodes by spore adhesion and invasive growth to break the nematode cuticle. By contrast, nematophagous bacteria can secrete virulence factors to kill nematodes. In addition, some bacteria can mobilize nematode-trapping fungi to kill nematodes. In response, nematodes can also sense and defend against the microbial pathogens using strategies such as producing anti-microbial peptides regulated by the innate immunity system. Recent progresses in our understanding of the signal pathways involved in microbe-nematode interactions are providing new insights in developing efficient biological control strategies against PPNs. This article is part of the theme issue 'Biotic signalling sheds light on smart pest management'.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaPest Control, BiologicalAnimalsFungiNematodaPlant DiseasesSignal Transductionbiocontrolmicrobe–nematode interactionnematophagous fungiplant-parasitic nematodesignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID30967028
PMCPMC6367146
OpenAlexW2910736309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.