Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30966962›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Beyond buying time: the role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change.

Rebecca J Fox, Jennifer M Donelson, Celia Schunter, Timothy Ravasi, Juan D Gaitán-Espitia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neighboring Gulf Killifish (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Combined generalist and host-specific transcriptional strategies enable host generalism in the fungal pathogenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca J Fox1 Division of Ecology and Evolution, Australian National University , Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 , Australia.
Jennifer M Donelson2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University , Townsville, Queensland 4810 , Australia.
Celia Schunter3 The Swire Institute of Marine Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong , Pokfulam Road , Hong Kong , SAR , People's Republic of China.
Timothy Ravasi4 KAUST Environmental Epigenetic Program (KEEP), Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology , Thuwal 23955-6900 , Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Juan D Gaitán-Espitia3 The Swire Institute of Marine Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong , Pokfulam Road , Hong Kong , SAR , People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How populations and species respond to modified environmental conditions is critical to their persistence both now and into the future, particularly given the increasing pace of environmental change. The process of adaptation to novel environmental conditions can occur via two mechanisms: (1) the expression of phenotypic plasticity (the ability of one genotype to express varying phenotypes when exposed to different environmental conditions), and (2) evolution via selection for particular phenotypes, resulting in the modification of genetic variation in the population. Plasticity, because it acts at the level of the individual, is often hailed as a rapid-response mechanism that will enable organisms to adapt and survive in our rapidly changing world. But plasticity can also retard adaptation by shifting the distribution of phenotypes in the population, shielding it from natural selection. In addition to which, not all plastic responses are adaptive-now well-documented in cases of ecological traps. In this theme issue, we aim to present a considered view of plasticity and the role it could play in facilitating or hindering adaption to environmental change. This introduction provides a re-examination of our current understanding of the role of phenotypic plasticity in adaptation and sets the theme issue's contributions in their broader context. Four key themes emerge: the need to measure plasticity across both space and time; the importance of the past in predicting the future; the importance of the link between plasticity and sexual selection; and the need to understand more about the nature of selection on plasticity itself. We conclude by advocating the need for cross-disciplinary collaborations to settle the question of whether plasticity will promote or retard species' rates of adaptation to ever-more stressful environmental conditions. This article is part of the theme issue 'The role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change'.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionClimate ChangeEnvironmentSelection, GeneticGenotypeacclimationclimate changeecological and evolutionary dynamicsgenetic assimilationgenotype×environment (GxE)selection

Identifiers

PMID30966962
PMCPMC6365870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.