Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30966957›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change: the importance of cue variation.

Suzanne Bonamour, Luis-Miguel Chevin, Anne Charmantier, Céline Teplitsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Plasticity in climate change responses.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suzanne BonamourCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier - EPHE , Campus CNRS, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier 5 , France.
Luis-Miguel ChevinCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier - EPHE , Campus CNRS, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier 5 , France.
Anne CharmantierCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier - EPHE , Campus CNRS, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier 5 , France.
Céline TeplitskyCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier - EPHE , Campus CNRS, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier 5 , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity is a major mechanism of response to global change. However, current plastic responses will only remain adaptive under future conditions if informative environmental cues are still available. We briefly summarize current knowledge of the evolutionary origin and mechanistic underpinnings of environmental cues for phenotypic plasticity, before highlighting the potentially complex effects of global change on cue availability and reliability. We then illustrate some of these aspects with a case study, comparing plasticity of blue tit breeding phenology in two contrasted habitats: evergreen and deciduous forests. Using long-term datasets, we investigate the climatic factors linked to the breeding phenology of the birds and their main food source. Blue tits occupying different habitats differ extensively in the cues affecting laying date plasticity, as well as in the reliability of these cues as predictors of the putative driver of selective pressure, the date of caterpillar peak. The temporal trend for earlier laying date, detected only in the evergreen populations, is explained by increased temperature during their cue windows. Our results highlight the importance of integrating ecological mechanisms shaping variation in plasticity if we are to understand how global change will affect plasticity and its consequences for population biology. This article is part of the theme issue 'The role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change'.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalClimate ChangeCuesReproductionAnimalsForestsSeasonsSongbirdsblue titclimate changecue reliabilitylaying datephenotypic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID30966957
PMCPMC6365871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.