Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30966952›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2019

Improved spatial ecological sampling using open data and standardization: an example from malaria mosquito surveillance.

Luigi Sedda, Eric R Lucas, Luc S Djogbénou, Ako V C Edi, Alexander Egyir-Yawson, Bilali I Kabula, Janet Midega, Eric Ochomo, David Weetman, Martin J Donnelly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Luigi Sedda1 Centre for Health Information, Computation and Statistics (CHICAS), Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University , Furness Building, Lancaster LA1 4YG , UK.
Eric R Lucas2 Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine , Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA , UK.
Luc S Djogbénou2 Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine , Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA , UK.
Ako V C Edi4 Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Cote d'Ivoire , 01 BP 1303 Abidjan 01 , Cote d'Ivoire.
Alexander Egyir-Yawson5 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Coast , Cape Coast , Ghana.
Bilali I Kabula6 National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Amani Centre , PO Box 81, Muheza , Tanzania.
Janet Midega7 Centre for Geographic Medicine Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute , PO Box 230, 80108 Kilifi , Kenya.
Eric Ochomo8 Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute , PO Box 1578 - 40100 Kisumu , Kenya.
David Weetman2 Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine , Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA , UK.
Martin J Donnelly2 Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine , Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA , UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBKenya Medical Research Institute · KELancaster University · GBNational Institute for Medical Research · TZSwiss Centre for Scientific Research · CIUniversity of Cape Coast · GH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P02520X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector-borne disease control relies on efficient vector surveillance, mostly carried out using traps whose number and locations are often determined by expert opinion rather than a rigorous quantitative sampling design. In this work we propose a framework for ecological sampling design which in its preliminary stages can take into account environmental conditions obtained from open data (i.e. remote sensing and meteorological stations) not necessarily designed for ecological analysis. These environmental data are used to delimit the area into ecologically homogeneous strata. By employing Bayesian statistics within a model-based sampling design, the traps are deployed among the strata using a mixture of random and grid locations which allows balancing predictions and model-fitting accuracies. Sample sizes and the effect of ecological strata on sample sizes are estimated from previous mosquito sampling campaigns open data. Notably, we found that a configuration of 30 locations with four households each (120 samples) will have a similar accuracy in the predictions of mosquito abundance as 200 random samples. In addition, we show that random sampling independently from ecological strata, produces biased estimates of the mosquito abundance. Finally, we propose standardizing reporting of sampling designs to allow transparency and repetition/re-use in subsequent sampling campaigns.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionAnimalsAnophelesEcosystemInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesMalariaMosquito VectorsResearch DesignInsecticidesadaptive and non-adaptive sampling designmodel-based geostatisticsmosquito samplingremote sensing and field datastratificationSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID30966952
PMCPMC6505554
OpenAlexW2899820737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.