Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30966916›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Risk taking and impulsive behaviour: fundamental discoveries, theoretical perspectives and clinical implications.

Anthony R Isles, Catharine A Winstanley, Trevor Humby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony R Isles1 MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Hadyn Ellis Building, Maindy Road, Cardiff CF24 4HQ , UK.
Catharine A Winstanley2 Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia , Vancouver Campus, 2136 West Mall, British Columbia , Canada V6T 1Z4.
Trevor Humby3 School of Psychology, Cardiff University , Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT , UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801418Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our willingness to take risks, our ability to wait or the speed with which to make decisions are central features of our personality. However, it is now recognized that impulsive and risk-taking behaviours are not a unitary construct, and different aspects can be both psychologically and neurally dissociated. The range of neurochemicals and brain systems that govern these behaviours is extensive, and this may be a contributing factor to the phenotypic range seen in the human population. However, this variety can also be pathological as extremes in risk-taking and impulsive behaviours are characteristics of many neuropsychiatric and indeed neurodegenerative disorders. This spans obsessive-compulsive disorder, where behaviour becomes ridged and non-spontaneous, to the nonsensical risk-taking seen in gambling and drug taking. This article is part of the theme issue 'Risk taking and impulsive behaviour: fundamental discoveries, theoretical perspectives and clinical implications'.

Indexed as

Impulsive BehaviorRisk-TakingDecision MakingHumansObsessive-Compulsive Disorderevolutionimpulsivityneurobiologypsychiatric illnessrisk

Identifiers

PMID30966916
PMCPMC6335461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.