Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30966857›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2019

Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks.

Allison N Catizone, Charly Ryan Good, Katherine A Alexander, Shelley L Berger, Morgan A Sammons

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allison N Catizonea Department of Biological Sciences , The State University of New York at Albany , Albany , NY , USA.
Charly Ryan Goodb Epigenetics Institute, Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology, Genetics, and Biology, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
Katherine A Alexanderb Epigenetics Institute, Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology, Genetics, and Biology, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
Shelley L Bergerb Epigenetics Institute, Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology, Genetics, and Biology, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5398-4400
Morgan A Sammonsa Department of Biological Sciences , The State University of New York at Albany , Albany , NY , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-1169
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · US

Funding

Role of PCAF/GCN5 Acetylation on p53 TransactivationR01CA078831 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI BERGER, SHELLEY L · 1999 to 2022
$7.8M
Molecular mechanisms regulating the establishment of cis-regulatory elements by the transcription factor p63R15GM128049 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI SAMMONS, MORGAN ANDREW · 2018 to 2018
$450k
Modulation of wild type and mutant p53 by HMGA1F32CA221010 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALEXANDER, KATHERINE ANN · 2018 to 2020
$188k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA221010NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078831NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM128049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is activated in response to diverse intrinsic and extrinsic cellular stresses and controls a broad cell-protective gene network. Whether p53:DNA binding and subsequent transcriptional activation differs downstream of these diverse intrinsic and extrinsic activators is controversial. Using primary human fibroblasts, we assessed the genome-wide profile of p53 binding, chromatin structure, and transcriptional dynamics after either genotoxic or nongenotoxic activation of p53. Activation of p53 by treatment with either etoposide or the small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor nutlin 3A yields strikingly similar genome-wide binding of p53 and concomitant changes to local chromatin modifications and structure. DNA damage, but not p53 activation per se, leads to increased expression of genes in an inflammatory cytokine pathway. The NF-κB pathway inhibitor Bay 11-7082 abrogates etoposide-mediated activation of the inflammation gene signature but does not affect expression of canonical p53 target genes. Our data demonstrate that differential activation of p53 within the same cell type leads to highly similar genome-wide binding, chromatin dynamics, and gene expression dynamics and that DNA damage-mediated signaling through NF-κB likely controls the observed pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression pattern.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell LineChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA DamageEtoposideFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansImidazolesNF-kappa BNitrilesPiperazinesProtein BindingProtein StabilityProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm23-(4-methylphenylsulfonyl)-2-propenenitrileEtoposideImidazolesNF-kappa BNitrilesnutlin 3PiperazinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2SulfonesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53ChIP-seqp53Transcription

Identifiers

PMID30966857
PMCPMC6527265
OpenAlexW2953054644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.