Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30966487›Full record

ArticlePolymers2018

Biocompatible and Antibacterial Nitric Oxide-Releasing Pluronic F-127/Chitosan Hydrogel for Topical Applications.

Milena T Pelegrino, Bruna De Araujo Lima, Mônica H M Do Nascimento, Christiane B Lombello, Marcelo Brocchi, Amedea B Seabra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in Nitric Oxide-Releasing Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications.Current opinion in colloid & interface science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milena T PelegrinoCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Universidade Federal do ABC, Av. dos Estados 5001, Santo André, SP, CEP 09210-580, Brazil. pelegrino.milena@ufabc.edu.br.
Bruna De Araujo LimaTropical Disease Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-862, Brazil. brunalimabio@gmail.com.
Mônica H M Do NascimentoNanomedicine Research Unit (NANOMED), Universidade Federal do ABC, Av. dos Estados 5001, Santo André, SP 09210-580, Brazil. monica.nasci@hotmail.com.
Christiane B LombelloCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Universidade Federal do ABC, Av. dos Estados 5001, Santo André, SP, CEP 09210-580, Brazil. Christiane.lombello@ufabc.edu.br.
Marcelo BrocchiTropical Disease Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-862, Brazil. mbrocchi@unicamp.br.
Amedea B SeabraCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Universidade Federal do ABC, Av. dos Estados 5001, Santo André, SP, CEP 09210-580, Brazil. amedea.seabra@ufabc.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-0380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is involved in physiological processes, including vasodilatation, wound healing and antibacterial activities. As NO is a free radical, designing drugs to generate therapeutic amounts of NO in controlled spatial and time manners is still a challenge. In this study, the NO donor

Indexed as

antimicrobialbiocompatibilitychitosannitric oxidePluronic F127Pseudomonas aeruginosaS-nitrosothiolsthermoresponsive hydrogel

Identifiers

PMID30966487
PMCPMC6415216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.