Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30966460›Full record

ArticlePolymers2018

Novel Nano-Liposome Formulation for Dry Eyes with Components Similar to the Preocular Tear Film.

Marta Vicario-de-la-Torre, María Caballo-González, Eva Vico, Laura Morales-Fernández, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos, Beatriz De Las Heras, José Manuel Benítez-Del-Castillo, Manuel Guzmán, Thomas Millar, Rocío Herrero-Vanrell and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Vicario-de-la-TorrePharmaceutical Innovation in Ophthalmology Research Group, UCM 920415, Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. martavicario@nutraessential.com.
María Caballo-GonzálezPharmaceutical Innovation in Ophthalmology Research Group, UCM 920415, Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. mcaballo@farm.ucm.es.
Eva VicoOcular Surface and Inflammation, Ophthalmology Department, San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. ebusqui@gmail.com.
Laura Morales-FernándezOcular Surface and Inflammation, Ophthalmology Department, San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. lauramoralesfernandez@gmail.com.
Pedro Arriola-VillalobosOcular Surface and Inflammation, Ophthalmology Department, San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. pedro_arriola@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3573-0842
Beatriz De Las HerasSanitary Research Institute of the San Carlos Clinical Hospital (IdISSC) and the Ocular Pathology National Net (OFTARED) of the Institute of Health Carlos III, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. lasheras@farm.ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0001-5089-8988
José Manuel Benítez-Del-CastilloOcular Surface and Inflammation, Ophthalmology Department, San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. benitezcastillo@gmail.com.
Manuel GuzmánDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Alcalá, Ctra Madrid-Barcelona, Km 33.6, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. manuel.guzman@uah.es.ORCID 0000-0002-7672-5484
Thomas MillarSchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Rydalmere Sydney, New South Wales 2116, Australia. t.millar@westernsydney.edu.au.
Rocío Herrero-VanrellPharmaceutical Innovation in Ophthalmology Research Group, UCM 920415, Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. rociohv@farm.ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9764-7975
Irene T Molina-MartínezPharmaceutical Innovation in Ophthalmology Research Group, UCM 920415, Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. iremm@ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-9157-571X
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ESWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

FEDER-CICYT FIS PI17/00079 and PI17/00466ISCII-FEDER RETICS (OFTARED) RD16/0008Research Group UCM 920415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye is commonly treated with artificial tears; however, developing artificial tears similar to natural tears is difficult due to the complex nature of tears. We characterized and evaluated a novel artificial tear formulation with components similar to the lipid and aqueous constituents of natural tears. Nano-liposomes, composed in part of phosphatidylcholine, were dispersed in an aqueous solution of bioadhesive sodium hyaluronate. Liposome size, zeta potential, and physicochemical properties of the fresh and stored (4 °C) liposomal formulation were analyzed. In vitro tolerance was tested using human corneal and conjunctival cell lines by exposures of 15 min to 4 h. The tolerance of the liposomal formulation was evaluated in animals (rabbits). The average liposome size was 186.3 ± 7.0 nm, and the zeta potential was negative. The osmolarity of the formulation was 198.6 ± 1.7 mOsm, with a surface tension of 36.5 ± 0.4 mN/m and viscosity of 3.05 ± 0.02 mPa·s. Viability values in the human corneal and conjunctival cell lines were always >80%, even after liposomal formulation storage for 8 weeks. Discomfort and clinical signs after instillation in rabbit eyes were absent. The new formulation, based on phosphatidylcholine-liposomes dispersed in sodium hyaluronate has suitable components and characteristics, including high in vitro cell viability and good in vivo tolerance, to serve as a tear substitute.

Indexed as

artificial tearsliposomesmucoadhesive polymerspreocular tear filmtear break-up time

Identifiers

PMID30966460
PMCPMC6415276
OpenAlexW2797040719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.