Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30966215›Full record

ArticlePolymers2018

Biocompatible Porous Polyester-Ether Hydrogel Scaffolds with Cross-Linker Mediated Biodegradation and Mechanical Properties for Tissue Augmentation.

Berkay Ozcelik, Jason Palmer, Katharina Ladewig, Paula Facal Marina, Geoffrey W Stevens, Keren Abberton, Wayne A Morrison, Anton Blencowe, Greg G Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Berkay OzcelikDepartment of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. ozcelikb@unimelb.edu.au.
Jason PalmerO'Brien Institute Department, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia. jpalmer@svi.edu.au.
Katharina LadewigDepartment of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. kladewig@unimelb.edu.au.
Paula Facal MarinaSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Paula.FacalMarina@unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6550-876X
Geoffrey W StevensDepartment of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. gstevens@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5788-4682
Keren AbbertonO'Brien Institute Department, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia. abberton@unimelb.edu.au.
Wayne A MorrisonO'Brien Institute Department, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia. wayne.morrison@unimelb.edu.au.
Anton BlencoweSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. anton.blencowe@unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7630-4874
Greg G QiaoDepartment of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. gregghq@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porous polyester-ether hydrogel scaffolds (PEHs) were fabricated using acid chloride/alcohol chemistry and a salt templating approach. The PEHs were produced from readily available and cheap commercial reagents via the reaction of hydroxyl terminated poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) derivatives with sebacoyl, succinyl, or trimesoyl chloride to afford ester cross-links between the PEG chains. Through variation of the acid chloride cross-linkers used in the synthesis and the incorporation of a hydrophobic modifier (poly(caprolactone) (PCL)), it was possible to tune the degradation rates and mechanical properties of the resulting hydrogels. Several of the hydrogel formulations displayed exceptional mechanical properties, remaining elastic without fracture at compressive strains of up to 80%, whilst still displaying degradation over a period of weeks to months. A subcutaneous rat model was used to study the scaffolds in vivo and revealed that the PEHs were infiltrated with well vascularised tissue within two weeks and had undergone significant degradation in 16 weeks without any signs of toxicity. Histological evaluation for immune responses revealed that the PEHs incite only a minor inflammatory response that is reduced over 16 weeks with no evidence of adverse effects.

Indexed as

biocompatiblebiodegradationhydrogelpolyester-etherscaffold

Identifiers

PMID30966215
PMCPMC6414870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.