ArticlePolymers2017
Preparation and Evaluation of Green Composites from Microcrystalline Cellulose and a Soybean-Oil Derivative.
Article in Polymers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Filler in the Form of Waste Wood Flour and Microcellulose on the Mechanical, Thermal, and Morphological Characteristics of Hierarchical Epoxy Composites.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Electrospun Maltodextrin Fibers for Efficient Removal of Nanoparticles, Atenolol, and Crystal Violet: Preparation and Characterization.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Valorizing Biopolyester Suberin: Modification of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Performance Assessment in 3D-Printed Biobased Acrylates.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Biobased Resin for Sustainable Stereolithography: 3D Printed Vegetable Oil Acrylate Reinforced with Ultra-Low Content of Nanocellulose for Fossil Resin Substitution.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Article
- Preparation and Characterization of 3D-Printed Biobased Composites Containing Micro- or Nanocrystalline Cellulose.Polymers · 2022Article
- Technological limitations in obtaining and using cellulose biocomposites.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Cellulose Nanocrystals vs. Cellulose Nanofibers: A Comparative Study of Reinforcing Effects in UV-Cured Vegetable Oil Nanocomposites.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Exploration of physicochemical properties and molecular interactions between cellulose and high-amylose cornstarch during extrusion processing.Current research in food science · 2021Article
- Characterization of Polyester Nanocomposites Reinforced with Conifer Fiber Cellulose Nanocrystals.Polymers · 2020Article
- Review
- Drying of the Natural Fibers as A Solvent-Free Way to Improve the Cellulose-Filled Polymer Composite Performance.Polymers · 2020Article
- Bacterial Cellulose and Emulsified AESO Biocomposites as an Ecological Alternative to Leather.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
- Synthesis and Properties of Tung Oil-Based Unsaturated Co-Ester Resins Bearing Steric Hindrance.Polymers · 2019Article
- Nanocellulose Stabilized Pickering Emulsion Templating for Thermosetting AESO Nanocomposite Foams.Polymers · 2018Article
- Article
- Preparation of Maleic Anhydride Grafted Polybutene and Its Application in Isotactic Polybutene-1/Microcrystalline Cellulose Composites.Polymers · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present work aimed at developing fully green composites from renewable materials, i.e., acrylated epoxidized soybean oil (AESO) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) by a solution casting method. The reinforcing effect of MCC on AESO resins was optimized by adjusting MCC loading from 20 to 40 wt % in terms of physical, mechanical, and thermal properties as well as water absorption of the resulting MCC/AESO composites. The interaction between MCC and AESO was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis, which revealed possible hydrogen bonds between the ⁻OH groups of MCC along with the polar components of AESO including C=O, ⁻OH, and epoxy groups. This was further evidenced by a benign interfacial adhesion between MCC and AESO resins as revealed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. The incorporation of MCC into AESO resins significantly increased the density, hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of the MCC/AESO composites, indicative of a significant reinforcing effect of MCC on AESO resins. The composite with 30 wt % MCC obtained the highest physical and mechanical properties due to the good dispersion and interfacial interaction between MCC and AESO matrix; the density, hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of the composite were 15.7%, 25.0%, 57.2%, and 129.7% higher than those of pure AESO resin, respectively. However, the water resistance at room temperature and 100 °C of the composites were dramatically decreased due to the inherent hydrophilicity of MCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.