Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30965758›Full record

ReviewPolymers2017

To Tie or Not to Tie? That Is the Question.

Pawel Dabrowski-Tumanski, Joanna I Sulkowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tangled Tail of Mechanically Interlocked Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Theta-curves in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Folding kinetics of an entangled protein.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Entangled Motifs in Membrane Protein Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Topological descriptions of protein folding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pawel Dabrowski-TumanskiCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw 02-097, Poland. p.dabrowski@cent.uw.edu.pl.
Joanna I SulkowskaCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw 02-097, Poland. jsulkowska@chem.uw.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we provide an overview of entangled proteins. Around 6% of protein structures deposited in the PBD are entangled, forming knots, slipknots, lassos and links. We present theoretical methods and tools that enabled discovering and classifying such structures. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the non-trivial topology in proteins, based on available data about folding, stability, biological properties and evolutionary conservation. We also formulate intriguing and challenging questions on the border of biophysics, bioinformatics, biology and mathematics, which arise from the discovery of an entanglement in proteins. Finally, we discuss possible applications of entangled proteins in medicine and nanotechnology, such as the chance to design super stable proteins, whose stability could be controlled by chemical potential.

Indexed as

disulfideknotslassolinkpolymertopology

Identifiers

PMID30965758
PMCPMC6418553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.