Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30965296›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019

Principal component analysis fosr fast and model-free denoising of multi b-value diffusion-weighted MR images.

Oliver J Gurney-Champion, David J Collins, Andreas Wetscherek, Mihaela Rata, Remy Klaassen, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Kevin J Harrington, Uwe Oelfke, Matthew R Orton

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Efficient PCA denoising of spatially correlated redundant MRI data.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. On the complexity of helical tomotherapy treatment plans.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver J Gurney-ChampionJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
David J Collins
Andreas Wetscherek
Mihaela Rata
Remy Klaassen
Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Kevin J Harrington
Uwe Oelfke
Matthew R Orton
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16464Cancer Research UK 19727Cancer Research UK 21993Cancer Research UK C33589/A19727Cancer Research UK C7224/A23275Department of Health C1060/A10334Department of Health C1060/A16464Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/M009068/1Medical Research Council MR/M009068/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the utility of tumour characterisation using quantitative parameter maps from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), clinicians often prefer the use of the image with highest diffusion-weighting (b-value), for instance for defining regions of interest (ROIs). However, these images are typically degraded by noise, as they do not utilize the information from the full acquisition. We present a principal component analysis (PCA) approach for model-free denoising of DWI data. PCA-denoising was compared to synthetic MRI, where a diffusion model is fitted for each voxel and a denoised image at a given b-value is generated from the model fit. A quantitative comparison of systematic and random errors was performed on data simulated using several diffusion models (mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential and kurtosis). A qualitative visual comparison was also performed for in vivo images in six healthy volunteers and three pancreatic cancer patients. In simulations, the reduction in random errors from PCA-denoising was substantial (up to 55%) and similar to synthetic MRI (up to 53%). Model-based synthetic MRI denoising resulted in substantial (up to 29% of signal) systematic errors, whereas PCA-denoising was able to denoise without introducing systematic errors (less than 2%). In vivo, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and sharpness of PCA-denoised images were superior to synthetic MRI, resulting in clearer tumour boundaries. In the presence of motion, PCA-denoising did not cause image blurring, unlike image averaging or synthetic MRI. Multi-b-value MRI can be denoised model-free with our PCA-denoising strategy that reduces noise to a level similar to synthetic MRI, but without introducing systematic errors associated with the synthetic MRI method.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPrincipal Component AnalysisSignal-To-Noise RatioCase-Control StudiesDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMovementPancreatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30965296
PMCPMC7655121
OpenAlexW2938974442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.