Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30964925›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Side effects by oral application of atmospheric pressure plasma on the mucosa in mice.

Lukasz Jablonowski, Thomas Kocher, Axel Schindler, Karolina Müller, Frank Dombrowski, Thomas von Woedtke, Thomas Arnold, Antje Lehmann, Stefan Rupf, Matthias Evert and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Applications of Plasma-Activated Water in Dentistry: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lukasz JablonowskiUnit of Periodontology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology, Endodontology, Preventive Dentistry and Pedodontics, Dental School, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7155-6522
Thomas KocherUnit of Periodontology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology, Endodontology, Preventive Dentistry and Pedodontics, Dental School, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Axel SchindlerLeibniz Institute of Surface Engineering (IOM), Leipzig, Germany.
Karolina MüllerCenter for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Frank DombrowskiInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas von WoedtkeLeibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology e.V. (INP Greifswald), Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas ArnoldLeibniz Institute of Surface Engineering (IOM), Leipzig, Germany.
Antje LehmannLeibniz Institute of Surface Engineering (IOM), Leipzig, Germany.
Stefan RupfClinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Matthias EvertInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Katja EvertInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DELeibniz Institute of Surface Engineering · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DESaarland University · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) has been investigated with promising results for peri-implant diseases treatment. However, prior to in-vivo applications of CAP sources in humans, short-term harmful mucosal damage or other unwanted side effects have to be reviewed. 180 male mice (B6C3F1) were divided into twelve treatment groups (n = 15). The right buccal cheek mucosa was treated with CAP. The first and second group each received continuous 10 sec irradiation with 2 different plasma sources (kINPen09, PS-MWM). The third group was treated with the kINPen09 for one minute. Control groups were treated with a corresponding dose of ultraviolet light for 8 seconds or 48 seconds and the other one was left untreated. The animals were weighed before and after treatment. The animals were sacrificed one day or one week after exposure. Stained tissue samples were histologically examined for tissue damage independently by two experienced pathologists. One day after CAP treatment histological analysis showed focal mucosal erosion with superficial ulceration and necrosis accompanied by a mild inflammatory reaction. One week after CAP treatment, the mucosal defects were completely re-epithelialized, associated with remnants of granulation tissue in the stroma irrespective of treatment duration. Furthermore, no cytological atypia was found and no severe weight loss occurred. The control groups did not show any alterations at all. CAP treatment led to a superficial mucosal damage that healed within few days. Nonetheless, further long-term experiments are necessary to exclude undesirable side effects after longer observation time. Particularly, potential carcinogenic effects must be ruled out prior to the application of CAP treatment in daily dental practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtmospheric PressureHyperplasiaInflammationMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMouth MucosaPlasma GasesPlasma Gases

Identifiers

PMID30964925
PMCPMC6456225
OpenAlexW2938288313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.