Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30964713›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Katja Brunner, Fatoumata Samassa, Philippe J Sansonetti, Armelle Phalipon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Shigellosis.Lancet (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  2. Microbial genomics · 2025
    Article
  3. Whole genome analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping the functional B-cell epitopes ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Exploring Natural Immune Responses toOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional assays to evaluate antibody-mediated responses againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Glycoconjugate vaccines againstBiophysical reviews · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katja Brunnera Molecular Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Department of Cellular Biology of Infection , Institut Pasteur , Paris , France.
Fatoumata Samassaa Molecular Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Department of Cellular Biology of Infection , Institut Pasteur , Paris , France.
Philippe J Sansonettia Molecular Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Department of Cellular Biology of Infection , Institut Pasteur , Paris , France.
Armelle Phalipona Molecular Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Department of Cellular Biology of Infection , Institut Pasteur , Paris , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enteropathogen,

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityImmune ToleranceImmunity, InnateAnimalsDysentery, BacillaryHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunity, HumoralIntestinesMiceShigellaType III Secretion SystemsVirulenceType III Secretion SystemsAdaptive immunitybacterialbacterial mucosaldysenteryenteropathogenimmune modulatorsimmunomodulationinfectious diseasemucosalT cellstype three secretion systemvirulence

Identifiers

PMID30964713
PMCPMC6663138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.