Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30964580›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2019

Rapid clinical exome sequencing in a pediatric ICU: Genetic counselor impacts and challenges.

Sarah V Clowes Candadai, Megan C Sikes, Jenny M Thies, Amanda S Freed, James T Bennett

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah V Clowes CandadaiDepartment of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Megan C SikesDivision of Genetic Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Jenny M ThiesDivision of Genetic Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Amanda S FreedDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
James T BennettDepartment of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Seattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Medical Genetics Training GrantT32GM007454 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Gail Pairitz Jarvik, Andrew Ben Stergachis · 1985 to 2026
$6.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exome sequencing (ES) has revolutionized molecular diagnosis in children with genetic disease over the past decade. However, exome sequencing in the inpatient setting has traditionally been discouraged, in part due to an increased risk of providers failing to retrieve and act upon results, as many patients are discharged before results return. The development of rapid turn-around-times (TATs) for genomic testing has begun to shift this paradigm. Rapid exome sequencing (rES) is increasingly being used as a diagnostic tool for critically ill infants with likely genetic disease and presents significant challenges to execute. We implemented a program, entitled the Rapid Inpatient Genomic Testing (RIGhT) project, to identify critically ill children for whom a molecular diagnosis is likely to change inpatient management. Two important goals of the RIGhT project were to provide appropriate genetic counseling, and to develop protocols to ensure efficient test coordination- both of which relied heavily on laboratory and clinic-based genetic counselors (GCs). Here, rES was performed on 27 inpatient trios from October 2016 to August 2018; laboratory and clinical GCs encountered significant challenges in the coordination of this testing. The GCs involved retrospectively reviewed these cases and identified three common challenges encountered during pretest counseling and coordination. The aim of this paper is to define these challenges using illustrative case examples that highlight the importance of including GCs to support rES programs.

Indexed as

CounselorsExome SequencingGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingIntensive Care Units, PediatricChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective Studiescritical careexome sequencinggenetic counselinggenomic testingincidental findingsinformed consentpediatricrapidsecondary findingsutilization management

Identifiers

PMID30964580
PMCPMC6481675
OpenAlexW2937708638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.