Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30964426›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2019

Feeding Success and Host Selection by

Joseph R McMillan, Paula L Marcet, Christopher M Hoover, Daniel Mead, Uriel Kitron, Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of peri-urban pig farms on mosquito community structure in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Parasites and wildlife in a changing world: The vector-host- pathogen interaction as a learning case.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph R McMillan1 Program in Population Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Paula L Marcet2 Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Entomology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christopher M Hoover3 Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California.
Daniel Mead4 Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Uriel Kitron1 Program in Population Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec1 Program in Population Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthropod vector feeding preferences are defined as an overutilization of a particular host species given its abundance in relationship to other species in the community. Numerous methods exist to quantify vector feeding preferences; however, controlled host choice experiments are generally an underutilized approach. In this report, we present results from controlled vector host choice experiments using

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAnimalsCulexFemaleGeorgiaMosquito VectorsPasseriformesSpecies SpecificityWest Nile FeverWest Nile virusAmerican robinnorthern cardinalvector feeding preferencesvectorial capacityWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID30964426
PMCPMC6625648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.