Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30964077›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2018

Infertility & assisted reproduction: A historical & modern scientific perspective.

Radhey Shyam Sharma, Richa Saxena, Rajeev Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Deprived areas and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Non-Hormonal Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. The advantages and disadvantages of altruistic and commercial surrogacy in India.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Radhey Shyam SharmaDivision of Reproductive Biology, Maternal & Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Richa SaxenaDivision of Reproductive Biology, Maternal & Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Rajeev SinghDepartment of Environmental Studies, Satyawati College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility has always been considered as a social stigma and has often been treated as socially, mentally and physically damaging experience for the childless women rather than man. Fatherhood was more a social rather than biological concept, thereby making childlessness a legitimate ground for divorce and a matter of disgrace for women. Every country has its own set of customs and traditional beliefs for the relief of childlessness. While introducing a second wife was one way to overcome the predicament of childlessness, divorce was also an available choice. There were several myths that contemplated the human concerns and their needs during ancient times. It is evident that types of the infertility and their treatment in the modern era have some historical background and different representations in the ancient civilizations. The present review discusses the historical and modern perspectives of infertility and assisted reproduction and their importance in different cultures.

Indexed as

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedFemaleHumansIndiaInfertilityMaleReproductionReproductive BehaviorSpousesAssisted reproductive technologychildlessnesscryopreservationculturefecundityfertilizationhistoryinfertilityin vitro fertilizationsurrogacy

Identifiers

PMID30964077
PMCPMC6469376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.