ArticleNeural regeneration research2019
Cell-free therapy: a neuroregenerative approach to sensory neuropathy?
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of alpha-lipoic acid in mitigating neuropathic pain: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Deciphering Molecular and Signaling Pathways of Extracellular Vesicles-Based Therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stem cell-derived cell-free technologies: a patent landscape.Biotechnology letters · 2024Review
- The Role of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Treatment of Stroke.Current neuropharmacology · 2024Review
- Crucial Factors Influencing the Involvement of Odontogenic Exosomes in Dental Pulp Regeneration.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023Review
- Pooled evidence from preclinical and clinical studies for stem cell-based therapy in ARDS and COVID-19.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2023Review
- Development of a Chemical Cocktail That Rescues Mouse Brain Demyelination in a Cuprizone-Induced Model.Cells · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.