Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30964011›Full record

ArticleIET nanobiotechnology2018

Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and mosquito larvicidal activity against dengue, zika and chikungunya causing vector

Sekaran Muthamil Selvan, Kabali Vijai Anand, Kasivelu Govindaraju, Selvaraj Tamilselvan, Vijayakumar Ganesh Kumar, Kizhaeral Sevathapandian Subramanian, Malaisamy Kannan, Kalimuthu Raja

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in IET nanobiotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sekaran Muthamil SelvanDepartment of Physics, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600 119, India.
Kabali Vijai AnandDepartment of Physics, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600 119, India. anandkvijai@gmail.com.
Kasivelu GovindarajuNanoscience Division, Centre for Ocean Research, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600 119, India.
Selvaraj TamilselvanNanoscience Division, Centre for Ocean Research, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600 119, India.
Vijayakumar Ganesh KumarNanoscience Division, Centre for Ocean Research, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600 119, India.
Kizhaeral Sevathapandian SubramanianDepartment of Nanoscience and Technology, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, India.
Malaisamy KannanDepartment of Nanoscience and Technology, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, India.
Kalimuthu RajaDepartment of Nanoscience and Technology, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, high purity copper oxide nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesised using

Indexed as

CopperInsecticidesAedesAnimalsAsteraceaeGreen Chemistry TechnologyLarvaMetal NanoparticlesMosquito VectorsPlant ExtractsRNA Virus InfectionsSpectrum AnalysisCoppercuprous oxideInsecticidesPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID30964011
PMCPMC8676226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.