Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963883›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Urban environment and cancer in wildlife: available evidence and future research avenues.

Tuul Sepp, Beata Ujvari, Paul W Ewald, Frédéric Thomas, Mathieu Giraudeau

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. A One Health Perspective on Cancer: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Consequences of Cancer on ZebrafishEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Approaches and methods to study wildlife cancer.The Journal of animal ecology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. You AreAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality Rates in Israel among Urban and Rural Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Tuul Sepp1 Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu , Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu , Estonia.
Beata Ujvari2 School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University , Waurn Ponds, VIC , Australia.
Paul W Ewald3 Department of Biology, University of Louisville , Louisville, KY 40292 , USA.
Frédéric Thomas4 CREEC , 911 Avenue Agropolis, BP 6450134394 Montpellier Cedex 5 , France.
Mathieu Giraudeau4 CREEC , 911 Avenue Agropolis, BP 6450134394 Montpellier Cedex 5 , France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDeakin University · AUUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is generally known that the risk of several cancers in humans is higher in urban areas compared with rural areas, cancer is often deemed a problem of human societies with modern lifestyles. At the same time, more and more wild animals are affected by urbanization processes and are faced with the need to adapt or acclimate to urban conditions. These include, among other things, increased exposure to an assortment of pollutants (e.g. chemicals, light and noise), novel types of food and new infections. According to the abundant literature available for humans, all of these factors are associated with an increased probability of developing cancerous neoplasias; however, the link between the urban environment and cancer in wildlife has not been discussed in the scientific literature. Here, we describe the available evidence linking environmental changes resulting from urbanization to cancer-related physiological changes in wild animals. We identify the knowledge gaps in this field and suggest future research avenues, with the ultimate aim of understanding how our modern lifestyle affects cancer prevalence in urbanizing wild populations. In addition, we consider the possibilities of using urban wild animal populations as models to study the association between environmental factors and cancer epidemics in humans, as well as to understand the evolution of cancer and defence mechanisms against it.

Indexed as

Animals, WildEnvironmentUrbanizationAnimalsCitiesNeoplasmsanthropogenic effectsneoplasiapace-of-lifesenescenceurbanizationwild animals

Identifiers

PMID30963883
PMCPMC6367167
OpenAlexW2909051185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.