Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963871›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Extreme and rapid bursts of functional adaptations shape bite force in amniotes.

Manabu Sakamoto, Marcello Ruta, Chris Venditti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimal Gearing of Musculoskeletal Systems.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution, conservatism and overlooked homologies of the mammalian skull.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Geometry and dynamics link form, function, and evolution of finch beaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manabu Sakamoto1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading , Reading, Berkshire RG6 6BX , UK.
Marcello Ruta2 School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln , Lincoln, Lincolnshire LN6 7DL , UK.
Chris Venditti1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading , Reading, Berkshire RG6 6BX , UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H007954/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptation is the fundamental driver of functional and biomechanical evolution. Accordingly, the states of biomechanical traits (absolute or relative trait values) have long been used as proxies for adaptations in response to direct selection. However, ignoring evolutionary history, in particular ancestry, passage of time and the rate of evolution, can be misleading. Here, we apply a recently developed phylogenetic statistical approach using significant rate shifts to detect instances of exceptional rates of adaptive changes in bite force in a large group of terrestrial vertebrates, the amniotes. Our results show that bite force in amniotes evolved through multiple bursts of exceptional rates of adaptive changes, whereby whole groups-including Darwin's finches, maniraptoran dinosaurs (group of non-avian dinosaurs including birds), anthropoids and hominins (fossil and modern humans)-experienced significant rate increases compared to the background rate. However, in most parts of the amniote tree of life, we find no exceptional rate increases, indicating that coevolution with body size was primarily responsible for the patterns observed in bite force. Our approach represents a template for future studies in functional morphology and biomechanics, where exceptional rates of adaptive changes can be quantified and potentially linked to specific ecological factors underpinning major evolutionary radiations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBiological EvolutionAnimalsBirdsBite ForceBody SizeFossilsMammalsPhylogenyReptilesadaptationsamniotesbite forceevolutionphylogenetic comparative methodsrate shifts

Identifiers

PMID30963871
PMCPMC6367170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.