Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963851›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Ancestral and offspring nutrition interact to affect life-history traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Joseph B Deas, Leo Blondel, Cassandra G Extavour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Grandfathers-to-Grandsons Transgenerational Transmission of Exercise Positive Effects on Cognitive Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Legacy of a Butterfly's Parental Microbiome in Offspring Performance.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Journal of neurogenetics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph B Deas1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02134 , USA.
Leo Blondel2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02134 , USA.
Cassandra G Extavour1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02134 , USA.

Funding

Genetic regulation of ovariole development in DrosophilaR01HD073499 · NICHD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI EXTAVOUR, CASSANDRA G · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancestral environmental conditions can impact descendant phenotypes through a variety of epigenetic mechanisms. Previous studies on transgenerational effects in Drosophila melanogaster suggest that parental nutrition may affect the body size, developmental duration and egg size of the next generation. However, it is unknown whether these effects on phenotype remain stable across generations, or if specific generations have general responses to ancestral diet. In the current study, we examined the effect on multiple life-history phenotypes of changing diet quality across three generations. Our analysis revealed unforeseen patterns in how phenotypes respond to dietary restriction. Our generalized linear model showed that when considering only two generations, offspring phenotypes were primarily affected by their own diet, and to a lesser extent by the diet of their parents or the interaction between the two generations. Surprisingly, however, when considering three generations, offspring phenotypes were primarily impacted by their grandparents' diet and their own diet. Interactions among different generations' diets affected development time, egg volume and pupal mass more than ovariole number or wing length. Furthermore, pairwise comparisons of diet groups from the same generation revealed commonalities in strong responses to rich versus poor diet: ovariole number, pupal mass and wing length responded more strongly to poor diet than to rich diet, while development time responded strongly to both rich and poor diets. To improve investigations into the mechanisms and consequences of transgenerational, epigenetic inheritance, future studies should closely examine how phenotypes change across a higher number of generations, and consider responses to broader variability in diet treatments.

Indexed as

Life History TraitsPhenotypeAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDrosophila melanogasterEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleMaleDrosophilainheritancenutritionphenotypestarvationtransgenerational epigenetic

Identifiers

PMID30963851
PMCPMC6408897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.