Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963842›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Diurnal variation in the production of vocal information about food supports a model of social adjustment in wild songbirds.

F Hillemann, E F Cole, S C Keen, B C Sheldon, D R Farine

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Why is the early bird early? An evaluation of hypotheses for avian dawn-biased vocal activity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The relative contribution of acoustic signals versus movement cues in group coordination and collective decision-making.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

F Hillemann1 Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3PS , UK.
E F Cole1 Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3PS , UK.
S C Keen1 Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3PS , UK.
B C Sheldon1 Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3PS , UK.
D R Farine1 Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3PS , UK.
University of Oxford · GBCornell University · USUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L006081/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wintering songbirds have been widely shown to make economic foraging decisions to manage the changing balance of risks from predation and starvation over the course of the day. In this study, we ask whether the communication and use of information about food availability differ throughout the day. First, we assessed temporal variation in food-related vocal information produced in foraging flocks of tits ( Paridae) using audio recordings at radio-frequency identification-equipped feeding stations. Vocal activity was highest in the morning and decreased into the afternoon. This pattern was not explained by there being fewer birds present, as we found that group sizes increased over the course of the day. Next, we experimentally tested the underlying causes for this diurnal calling pattern. We set up bird feeders with or without playback of calls from tits, either in the morning or in the afternoon, and compared latency to feeder discovery, accumulation of flock members, and total number of birds visiting the feeder. Irrespective of time of day, playbacks had a strong effect on all three response measures when compared to silent control trials, demonstrating that tits will readily use vocal information to improve food detection throughout the day. Thus, the diurnal pattern of foraging behaviour did not appear to affect use and production of food-related vocalizations. Instead, we suggest that, as the day progresses and foraging group sizes increase, the costs of producing calls at the food source (e.g. competition and attraction of predators) outweigh the benefits of recruiting group members (i.e. adding individuals to large groups only marginally increases safety in numbers), causing the observed decrease in vocal activity into the afternoon. Our findings imply that individuals make economic social adjustments based on conditions of their social environment when deciding to vocally recruit group members.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorVocalization, AnimalAnimalsCircadian RhythmEnglandModels, BiologicalSeasonsSongbirdscollective animal behaviourforaginggroup livingsignallingsocial information usevocal recruitment

Identifiers

PMID30963842
PMCPMC6408885
OpenAlexW2916850124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.