ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019
Global predictors of alien plant establishment success: combining niche and trait proxies.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climatic niche conservatism in non-native plants depends on introduction history and biogeographic context.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Niche Dynamics of Alien Plant Species in Mediterranean Europe.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Can Macroevolution Inform Contemporary Extinction Risk?Ecology letters · 2025Review
- Patterns of phylogenetic relatedness of non-native plants across the introduction-naturalization-invasion continuum in China.Plant diversity · 2023Article
- Indigenous and introduced Collembola differ in desiccation resistance but not its plasticity in response to temperature.Current research in insect science · 2023Article
- An exotic plant successfully invaded as a passenger driven by light availability.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Persistent soil seed banks promote naturalisation and invasiveness in flowering plants.Ecology letters · 2021Article
- Invasive alien plant species: Their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health.Ecological indicators · 2020Review
- Evolutionary history predicts high-impact invasions by herbivorous insects.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological invasions are on the rise globally. To reduce future invasions, it is imperative to determine the naturalization potential of species. Until now, screening approaches have relied largely on species-specific functional feature data. Such information is, however, time-consuming and expensive to collect, thwarting the screening of large numbers of potential invaders. We propose to resolve such data limitations by developing indicators of establishment success of alien species that can be readily derived from open-access databases. These indicators describe key features of successfully established aliens, including estimates of potential range size, niche overlap with human-disturbed environments, and proxies of species traits related to their palaeoinvasions and local dominance capacities. We demonstrate the utility of this new approach by applying it to two large and highly invasive plant groups: Australian acacias and eucalypts. Our results show that these indicators robustly predict establishment successes and failures in each clade independently, and that they can cross-predict establishment in these two clades. Interestingly, the indicator identified as most important was species potential range size on Earth, a variable too rarely considered as a predictor. By successfully identifying key features that predispose Australian plants to naturalize, we provide an objective and cost-effective protocol for flagging high-risk introductions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.